Image credit: KT Lowe, Indiana University East Library
Sick and tired of seeing misinformation? Never know who or what to trust? Can't figure out if what you've heard is true? Feel duped? Want better tools to sort truth from fiction? Here's a quick guide to sorting out facts, weighing information and being knowledgeable online and off.
Is the author specialized in the field that the article is concerned with? Do they work in that field? Check LinkedIn or do a quick Google search to see if the author can speak about the subject with authority and accuracy?
When an article cites sources, it's good to check them out. Sometimes official-sounding associations are really biased think tanks or represent only a fringe view of a large group of people. If you can't find sources, read as much about the topic as you can to get a feel for what's already out there and decide for yourself if the article is accurate or not.
Does the article seem to lean toward a particular point of view? Does it link to sites, files, or images that seem to skew left or right? Biased articles may not be giving you the whole story.
Like eggs and milk, information can have an expiration date. In many cases, use the most up-to-date information you can find.
If what you're reading seems too good to be true, or too weird, or too reactionary, it probably is.
It's never too late to seek out good information!
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Nearly all of us have been taken in by a video that was later found to have been doctored or faked. It is fairly easy to edit a video so that it looks like you made the basket or the hawk picked up the snake. Here are some of the most famous faked videos that fooled millions:
These Viral Videos Were Fake?!
Some tips to help you tell if a video is fake:
This case study was published in The New York Times on November 11, 2016.
We Tracked Down a Fake News Creator in the Suburbs. Here's What We Learned, NPR, Nov. 23, 2016
This LibGuide was created by Ann Grandmaison and Susan Leonardi, Reference Librarians at Northern Essex Community College in Haverhill and Lawrence MA.
agrandmaison@necc.mass.edu
sleonardi@necc.mass.edu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Source: Statista, Where False Information is Posing the Biggest Threat, January 2024
Image credit: KT Lowe, Indiana University East Library
A fake news article may or may not have links in it tracing its sources; if it does, these links may not lead to articles outside of the site's domain or may not contain information pertinent to the article topic.
Fake news plays on your feelings--it makes you angry or happy or scared. This is to ensure that you won't do anything as pesky as fact-checking
Most authors aren't even journalists, but paid trolls.
If you look up the main idea of a fake news article, you might not find any other news outlet (real or not) reporting on the issue.
Did your article come from abcnews.com.co? Or Realnewsrightnow.com? These and a host of other URLs are fake news sites.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
image credit: Huffington Post
The 2016 presidential election campaign may always be remembered for the proliferation of fake news stories. Viral news hoaxes have been around for many years, but 2016 is the year they exploded into the consciousness of the American public. Evaluating information has never been more important.
The weekend after the Presidential Election, Melissa Zimdars, a professor at Merrimack College, learned that the top result returned by a Google search about the election's popular vote was to an article claiming that Trump carried the popular vote. Not true. Hillary Clinton had over one million more votes than Trump at the time (and eventually, more than 2.5 million, while many fake news sites continued to report the contrary). This article was on an untrustworthy news site and caused Professor Zimdars to compile suggestions on how to spot a fake news site. [Google Doc]
The chart shows headline/publisher text in the first column and number of Facebook engagements in the second column.
Headline "Pope Francis Shocks World, Endorses Donald Trump for President, Releases Statement" Publisher: Ending the Fed
Facebook Engagements: 960,000
Headline: "WikiLeaks CONFIRMS Hilary Sold Weapons to ISIS...Then Drops Another BOMBSHELL! Breaking News" Publisher: Political Insider
Facebook Engagements: 789,000
Headline: "IT'S OVER: Hilary's ISIS Email Just Leaked & It's Worse Than Anyone Could Have Imagined" Publisher: Ending the Fed
Facebook Engagements: 754,000
Headline: Just Read The Law: Hilary is Disqualified From Holding Any Federal Office" Publisher: Ending the Fed
Facebook Engagements: 701,000
Headline: "FBI Agent Suspected in Hilary Email Leaks Found Dead in Apartment Murder-Suicide" Publisher: Denver Guardian
Facebook Engagements: 567,000
Fake news: 8.7 million
Mainstream news: 7.3 million
According to Professor Zimdars, fake news can be broadly categorized as follows:
CATEGORY 1: Fake, false, or regularly misleading websites that are shared on Facebook and social media. Some of these websites may rely on “outrage” by using distorted headlines and decontextualized or dubious information in order to generate likes, shares, and profits.
CATEGORY 2: Websites that may circulate misleading and/or potentially unreliable information
CATEGORY 3: Websites which sometimes use clickbait-y headlines and social media descriptions
CATEGORY 4: Satire/comedy sites, which can offer important critical commentary on politics and society, but have the potential to be shared as actual/literal news
No single topic falls under a single category - for example, false or misleading medical news may be entirely fabricated (Category 1), may intentionally misinterpret facts or misrepresent data (Category 2), may be accurate or partially accurate but use an alarmist title to get your attention (Category 3) or may be a critique on modern medical practice (Category 4.) Some articles fall under more than one category. It is up to you to do the legwork to make sure your information is good.
See also 6 types of misinformation circulated during the 2016 election season from the Columbia Journalism Review.
Image source: Fake News is a Real Problem, Statista, 2016. Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License.
Ukiah Campus: 707.468.3053 | Coast Center: 707.961.2200 | Lake Center: 707.263.4944 | North County Center: 707.459.6224 Email: Library Webmaster | Mendocino Community College
Powered by Springshare. Login to LibApps